Yesterday night, I watched the final
episode of the new tv-series of Spartacus
(Spartacus: Blood and Sand 2010, Spartacus: Gods of the Arena 2011, Spartacus: Vengeance 2012, and Spartacus: War of the Damned 2013), the
gladiator that sparked the greatest slave
rebellion in the history of the Roman Empire. First now, I realised his
greatness.
The tv-show is gruesomely violent and gory,
which might be off-putting to viewers with sensible stomachs, and to many it
might appear that the show is all about the moviemakers having fun producing
exaggeratedly bloody fight scenes with arms dropping off, heads and bodies
cleaved in halves, and soldiers being slashed so hard they fly away. However,
the mature viewer will value the battles as being metaphorical, as well as amazingly well done. (Actually, I love the
battles because I appreciate both interpretations.)
Regardless, what I want to discuss here is
one of the main philosophical messages in this show, which might not be
apparent at first.
I am sure that most of the events in the
three and a half seasons (Spartacus: Gods
of the Arena is short and only counts as a mini-series) are speculative and
have little factual support, since written records and archeological finds from
that period are scarce, but I still want to discuss the fictional character Spartacus in the series (i.e. regardless of how
it reflects the real person), because it is he who inspired my thoughts.
Spartacus, acted
by Liam McIntyre in the final two seasons, develops into a much more epic
character as the story evolves than I would ever have expected.
My mom is not fond of the tale of
Spartacus, because he suffers and struggles so much throughout his entire life,
which bluntly ends in failure. In the tv-show, he is captured with his wife;
she is enslaved and probably raped countless times until she finally dies,
while Spartacus is sold as a gladiator, savagely drilled to fight and endure
physical pain, and forced to kill his only friend by a whim of his arrogant and
ambitious master.
Andy Whitfield
played the role of Spartacus in the first season, but died of
lymphoma (cancer
in white blood cells).
When learning that the master he has been
bowing like a dog to was the one that had his wife murdered, Spartacus spurs a
gladiator uprising, slaughters all Roman nobles within reach. Now craving
revenge on the Roman praetor that captured him and his wife, he builds an army
of fighting slaves (whose chaotic nature challenge his patience more than a few
times) to match the Roman forces sent to destroy him. When victorious,
Spartacus continues to swell his army, now with the unfeasible goal of crushing
the Roman Empire. After years of fighting bloody battles and struggling to give
his people what they need (food, shelter, etc.) and want (some desire only to
fight endlessly, others dream of living their lives in freedom and peace), the
rebels are defeated at the Siler River, and it turns out that all the pain and
losses (on both sides) had been in vain.
Spartacus has all
the reasons to be angry… Image from
The plot is indeed tragic, but that makes
Spartacus the more admirable! What I thought of when I was watching the last
episode, and the thing I want to emphasise here, is that throughout his time, Spartacus had ample opportunities to run away and settle down for a long, restful
life, something he unquestionably earned for what he has sacrificed, but he never abandoned the fight for his
ideal – that all have the right to live free.
Although he had
many opportunities, Spartacus never took the easy
way out, but stood
persistently for his ideal that no
man or woman should be a slave.
Image from http://spartacus.wikia.com/wiki/Spartacus
Spartacus fights against the Roman people
to free the slaves from oppression and injustice. He fights for the value and
dignity of every human being, while many others fight because they are angry and
enjoy killing Romans. (Spartacus appears to enjoy the slaughter, but I suspect
that it is only to keep his much-needed companions keen and engaged.)
There seems to be no reason for Spartacus
to pursue his struggle against the Roman Empire, other than that he believes so
strongly that it is the right thing to do. He does not revel in pleasure of
killing his hated enemies, he knows that no amount of slaughter will bring back
the loved ones he already has lost, and he really has no moral obligation to devote
himself to this campaign.
So, what I read into this is that Spartacus made it the purpose of his life to fight for the dignity of all men and women. He is a man who has lost
everything, but instead of crying in a corner, he selflessly makes it his life’s
quest to protect all others who have suffered similar fates. And, despite all
instances where most people would give up and retreat to live in peace and comfort,
he never fell to the temptation. This is the hallmark of a true hero.
For all he has
suffered, Spartacus’ spirit was never broken.
This is the hallmark of a true hero. And such people do exist today. From this day on, I will respect them
as I respect Spartacus, but more so because what they are doing for needing people
is real.
I still don't know if I want to see Spartacus, bu I agree with you that he does seem to be a hero in the sense that he fights for what he believes to be right. Reading this also reminded me of a blog I found recently and in particular a podcast on that blog. If you feel like it you can listen, because I think you would find it interesting: http://goinswriter.com/wp3/
ReplyDelete